﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title>South Carolina Community Association Law Blog: Recent Comments</title>
	<updated>2008-08-29T05:32:15Z</updated>
	<id>http://sccommunityassociationlaw.com/comments/atom.aspx</id>
	<link rel="self" href="http://sccommunityassociationlaw.com/comments/atom.aspx" />
	<link rel="alternate" href="http://sccommunityassociationlaw.com" />
	<generator uri="http://app.onlinequickblog.com/" version="2.0">Quick Blog</generator>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on FCC Issues Order Banning Exclusivity Contract with Cable Providers</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://sccommunityassociationlaw.com/2008/04/02/fcc-issues-order-banning-exclusivity-contract-with-cable-providers.aspx#comment-1146860" />
		<id>tag:sccommunityassociationlaw.com,2008-06-25:1146860</id>
		<author>
			<name>battery</name>
			<uri>http://www.batteryfast.com</uri>
		</author>
		<updated>2008-06-29T15:50:11Z</updated>
		<published>2008-06-25T04:13:35Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[[…] On the substantive side, a few legislators got to ask the cable people serious questions. Points for substance go to Garrison (D-Marietta), Stewart (R-Athens), Okey (D-Carrollton), Barrett (D-Amherst), and Foley and Williams (D-Cleveland). […]]]></content>
	</entry>
</feed>